In Rod Serling’s  “A Penny For Your Thoughts” (Twilight Zone episode 52, February 3, 1961) Twilight Zone resident Hector B. Poole, an easily identified with everyman, is given the ability to hear other people’s thoughts. This ability is bestowed when a coin toss results in the “freakish chance of a million” of the coin landing on its edge. Mr. Poole soon unhappily learns about the dissonance between people's thoughts and their behavior. Poole’s confusion and anxiety is optimistically relieved when, at episodes end, the ability to read other people’s thoughts is lost as he upends the still edge standing coin.

 

I would respectfully submit for your consideration that today we are all Twilight Zone residents. Social media has given us the ability to experience the thoughts and perspectives of others. Consequently we are also unhappily learning more than we ever wanted to know about the dissonance between people's thoughts and their behavior. Like Poole, our subsequent confusion and anxiety can only be optimistically relieved when we “upend the coin” of social media by disconnecting.

                                               - theGUDA -

                      "It is hard to believe nowadays that people could ever have been as brilliantly duplicitous as James Wait-until I remind myself that just about every adult human being back then had a brain weighing about three kilograms!

 

There was no end to the evil schemes that a thought machine that oversized couldn’t imagine and execute.

  

So I raise this question, although there is nobody around to answer it: Can it be doubted that three-kilogram brains were once nearly fatal defects in the evolution of the human race?

 

A second query: What source was there back then, save for our overelaborate nervous circuitry, for the evils we were seeing or hearing about simply everywhere?

 

My answer: There was no other source. This was a very innocent planet, except for those great big brains."

                                               - Kurt Vonnegut, Galapagos -

                         "It isn't what we don't know that gives trouble, it's what we do know that ain't so."

                                                     - Will Rogers - 

                      In 2017 the American public learned that the sensitive data of 150 million Americans had been plundered from the Equifax credit bureau by unnamed hackers. The stolen data included Social Security and drivers license numbers, birthdates, addresses, payment histories and other personal information.

 

The United States government’s and Equifax’s response to the breach included fines levied on Equifax by jurisdictional government agencies, netting hundreds of millions for the government, and class action law suit settlements netting millions to trial lawyers. For those who could prove their data had been compromised these settlements resulted in payments of a few dollars and/or a year’s worth of free Equifax credit monitoring (once enrolled a user would have the choice after year one to continue the credit monitoring for a fee as part of Equifax’s subscriber service).

 

Thus a business opportunity was created from Equifax’s indifference and incompetence. 

 

No meaningful legislation or regulations concerning individual privacy rights or an organization’s responsibilities and liabilities to protect those privacy rights has ever been enacted as a result of this breach.

 

In 2019 the American public learned that a federal grand jury had indicted four Chinese nationals working for the People’s Liberation Army in the Equifax breach. The Equifax breach thus joined other mass-scale breaches including 20 million files of United States government employees and their associates from the Office of Personnel Management, tens of millions records from Anthem health insurance (health insurance records comprise the most sensitive of personal information and are nominally protected under Federal HIPPA laws), and hundreds of millions of records from Marriott International (2014). Investigations and indictments involving these hacks accuse operatives and associates of the Chinese Communist Party as the perpetrators.

 

No meaningful legislation or regulations concerning individual privacy rights or an organization’s responsibilities and liabilities to protect those privacy rights has ever been enacted as a result of these breaches.

 

Unites States intelligence agencies worry that analysis of stolen data will lead to counterintelligence dossiers used to compromise U.S. diplomats and undercover spies.

 

Chinese intelligence will likely use the massive data in efforts to develop artificial-intelligence capabilities.

 

Ironically, part of the Equifax breach included theft of Equifax’s proprietary database management capabilities. Thus the Chinese stole not only the data of hundreds of millions of Americans but also the means to make that data intelligible to the thieves.

 

The final irony appears to be the very likely possibility that The Chinese Communist Party now holds dossiers and personal information for most Americans that are more complete and thorough than anything the U.S. government, commercial or private American institutions currently, legally possess.

 

Maybe the CCP will offer a personal data backup service to Americans in the near future. Thus, creating a business opportunity from American indifference and incompetence.

                                               - theGUDA -

                     “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”

                                               - George Orwell, 1984 - 

                      “I believe there is one story in the world, and only one, that has frightened and inspired us, so that we live in a Pearl White serial of continuing thought and wonder. Humans are caught - in their lives, in their thoughts, in their hungers and ambitions, in their avarice and cruelty, and in their kindness and generosity too - in a net of good and evil. I think this is the only story we have and that it occurs on all levels of feeling and intelligence. Virtue and vice were warp and woof of our first consciousness, and they will be the fabric of our last, and this despite any changes we may impose on field and river and mountain, on economy and manners. There is no other story. A man, after he has brushed off the dust and chips of his life, will have left only the hard, clean questions: Was it good or was it evil? Have I done well  -  or ill?"

                                               - John Steinbeck, East of Eden -

 -                    "It was like coming this close to your dreams and then watching them brush past you like a stranger in a crowd. At the time, you don't think much of it. You know, we just don't recognize the most significant moments of our lives while they're happening. Back then I thought there'll be other days. I didn't realize that was the only day."

                                               - Moonlight Graham, Field of Dreams - 

                     "A second with you is like a year with an angry mob."

                                               - Maurice "Buddy" Sorrell - 

                     A song went around from fiddler to fiddler and each one added something and took something away so that in time the song became a different thing from what it had been, barely recognizable in either tune or lyric. But you could not say the song had been improved, for as was true of all human effort, there was never advancement. Everything added meant something lost, and about as often as not the thing lost was preferable to the thing gained, so that over time we'd be lucky if we just broke even. Any thought otherwise was empty pride.

                                               - Charles Frazier, Cold Mountain -

                     For the longest time I thought Vonnegut and his depiction of humanity as an evolutionary experiment in big brains, or it’s corollary argument of big brains with opposable thumbs, to be most likely. Now I tend to agree more with Mr. Spock and his Vulcan kin. Humanity, as an evolutionary experiment, is best defined as an experiment in emotion and impulse.

                                               - theGUDA - 

                       In Pierre’s relations with Villarsky, with his cousin, with the doctor, and with all the people he met now, there was a new feature that gained him the good-will of all. That was the recognition of the freedom of every man to think, to feel, and to look at things in his own way; the recognition of the impossibility of altering a man’s convictions by words. This legitimate individuality of every man’s views, which in old days troubled and irritated Pierre, now formed the basis of the sympathetic interest he felt in people. The inconsistency, sometimes the complete antagonism of men’s views with their own lives or with one another, delighted Pierre, and drew from him a gentle and making smile.

                                               - Leo Tolstoy, War and Peace -

                      The evil that is in the world always comes of ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence, if they lack understanding. On the whole men are more good than bad; that, however, isn't the real point. But they are more or less ignorant, and it is this that we call vice or virtue; the most incorrigible vice being that of an ignorance that fancies it knows everything and therefore claims for itself the right to kill. The soul of the murderer is blind; and there can be no true goodness or love without the utmost clear-sightednesss.

                                                - Albert Camus, The Plague -

                      In other words, just as we have abstracted time and God, we have abstracted place. This Cartesian view, in which we move between fixed, objective points, underlies modern science and has led to breathtaking technological advances. The charts and instruments used by European explorers allowed their ships to conquer the Earth. We’ve since taken that approach to exquisite heights. We use ever more sophisticated technology to navigate not just over the ocean but across the solar system, while fleets of artificial satellites (fitted with atomic clocks) have replaced the stars, allowing us to track positions on Earth to within a few feet. With GPS information now routinely beamed to cars and phones, we can find our location without even looking out the window, let alone up at the sky.

    

But there has been a price to pay. Psychologists and neuroscientists warn that when we rely on technology to perform our tasks such as navigation for us, our awareness of our physical environment fades as we become immersed instead in an abstract, computerized world. Studies show that we tend to place too much faith in the accuracy of information from computer monitors, and to ignore or discount information from our own eyes and ears, an effect that has caused pilots to crash planes and GPS-following tourists to drive into the sea. A team led by the British neuroscientist Hugo Spiers found in 2017 that areas of the brain normally involved in navigation just don’t engage when people use GPS. "When we have technology telling us which way to go," said Spiers, "these parts of the brain simply don’t respond to the street network. In that sense our brain has switched off its interest in the streets around us."

    

Others studies have shown that people who regularly use GPS become less able to find their way without it, a phenomenon thought to be caused by structural changes in the brain as underused regions start to shrink. Just as sedentary lifestyles weaken us physically, over-reliance on technologies to perform sensory or intellectual tasks appears to dull us mentally, and might even make us more prone to neurodegenerative conditions such as dementia. The more we rely on computers instead of our physical experience, the more we erode our awareness and skills.

    

In one sense, then, those invisible lines of longitude and latitude have connected us to the universe in a way that early societies couldn’t have imagined. Like moorings or guide ropes, they gave us a frame of reference, enabling breathtaking insights and abilities and allowing us to fix our position not just on the ocean but with respect to the planet, solar system and farther stars. But at the same time, the invention of abstract space was one more step in our journey from a subjective view of the universe to an objective one; from being inextricably entwined with—even creators of—the cosmos to becoming recorder and observers of an independently existing reality. 

    

Tupaia’s story throws into relief the choices we’ve made. Our view of space—as of time—now feels so self-evident, it’s hard to see any alternative. It’s easy to assume that a mathematical, objective approach is the best—if not the only—way to learn about the ‘real’ physical world. Yet instead of discarding their experience of the cosmos, Polynesian navigators maximized its potential in order to explore millions of square miles of ocean. A mix of stories and songs, senses and instinct, enabled them to achieve—without technology—feats of navigation that as westerners we can barely imagine.

                                             - Jo Marchant, The Human Cosmos -

                      “Everything will be denied. Everything will become a creed. It is a reasonable position to deny the stones in the street; it will be a religious dogma to assert them. Fires will be kindled to testify that two and two make four. Swords will be drawn to prove that leaves are green in summer. We shall be left defending, not only the incredible virtues and sanities of human life, but something more incredible still, this huge impossible universe which stares us in the face.”

                                             - Gilbert K. Chesterton -